Utopian Galt wrote to boraxman <=-

BY: boraxman(21:1/101)

Im thinking of making a 2nd bbs Called Inland Utopia 2.0
Maybe I might do that.

It would be easier to administer and keep the malcontents off too, if it
is dedicated BBS?

It would be a BBS I might join myself, depending on how it goes.

I wanted to make like 20-30 message bases with forums of various
topics. BBS would be largely center-right, but would be inclusive to
drug legalization/decriminalization and lgbtq (positive and skeptics).

Sound like something I would be interested in, though my politics isn't that 'centrist', which leads to me being accused, often in the same thread, of being a "Marxist" or "Socialist" or "Fascist" or "Right Wing". Usually this is the result of people not really understanding a novel point of view and wanting to find which category they can throw it under in order to use an epithet instead of a logical argument as a retort.

When that happens, the discussion usually turns south. That is the big problem with political discussions, it either IS a discussion of one of these tired ideologies, or people try desperately to turn it into a discussion of one of those ideologies so they have familiar ground to argue on.

Hence why I think it should be confined to a BBS where it could be regulated, instead of on fsxNet.

___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/24 (Linux/64)
* Origin: Agency BBS | Dunedin, New Zealand | agency.bbs.nz (21:1/101)

BY: boraxman(21:1/101)

Hence why I think it should be confined to a BBS where it could be regulated,
instead of on fsxNet.

Yes, we could create our own unique kingdoms and that makes our own bbses special places.
Im working on modifying my synchronet bbs for Inland Utopia 2.0


--- WWIV 5.5.1.3261
* Origin: inland utopia * california * iutopia.duckdns.org:2023 (21:4/108)